Legal Opinion
State v. Perez
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 2006No. CC 0201-30132; CA A119741; SC S52267PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.
The issue in this criminal case is whether the Court of Appeals improperly considered, as plain error, an unpreserved claim of sentencing error under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000) and Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004). State v. Perez, 196 Or App 364, 373, 102 P3d 705 (2004). For the reasons that follow, we hold that the Court of Appeals should not have considered the claim of error.
The following facts are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. WiltseOregon Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. SteenOregon Supreme Court · 2009
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.