Legal Opinion

State v. Ramirez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 19, 2007No. C030767CR; A123657PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The state petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, State v. Ramirez, 205 Or App 113, 133 P3d 343 (2006), in which we concluded that the trial court committed plain error when it imposed a departure sentence based on its own findings of fact. The state argues that our opinion is at odds with the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Perez, 340 Or 310, 131 P3d 168 (2006). We have carefully reviewed the state’s arguments but, for the reasons that follow, we find them unpersuasive. We therefore adhere to our original opinion.

We begin with a brief recapitulation of our original opinion and its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. FultsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API