Legal Opinion

Girard v. Miller

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1935No. 6253PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff seeks herein a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, who has heretofore refused, to provide a ballot title for a referendum petition, under chapter 210, Idaho Session Laws, 1933. An alternative writ issued and the case has been argued and submitted.

The defendant justifies his refusal on various statutory and constitutional grounds, and questions have been argued and presented to the court, none of which are deemed to be at the present time properly before the court, or essential to a decision of this matter.

The sole point now determined, and deemed necessary to be determined, is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beem v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Logan v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Porter v. AdairIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Noh v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. American Civil Liberties Union, Idaho Chapter v. EchohawkIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Robbins v. Joint Class A. School Dist. No. 331Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. American Civil Liberties Union, Idaho Chapter v. EchohawkIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Noh v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API