Legal Opinion
Noh v. Cenarrusa
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 2002No. 28590Published
1Opinion of the Court
53 P.3d 1217 (2002)
137 Idaho 798
In the Matter of the Petition/Action to Determine the Constitutionality of the Indian Gaming Initiative, Proposition One.
Laird NOH; Maxine T. Bell; Paul Christensen; Pamela Eaton; and Bryan Fischer, Petitioners,
v.
Pete T. CENARRUSA, in his capacity as Idaho Secretary of State, and Ernest L. Stensgar, real party in interest, Respondents, and
Idaho Coalition for Indian Self Reliance, Intervenor-respondent.
No. 28590.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, September 2002 Term.
August 28, 2002.
Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock & Fields, Chtd, Boise, for petitioners. Robert E.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.