Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Noh v. Cenarrusa

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2002No. 28590PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

The Petitioners assert the Indian Gaming Initiative violates the Idaho Constitution’s prohibition against gambling, violates notions of equal protection, and that it extinguishes existing debts. The Petitioners seek an order and/or writ prohibiting the Secretary of State from placing the initiative on the November, 2002 ballot. This matter is before the Court upon the petition and a motion to dismiss the petition.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Indian Gaming Initiative (Proposition One) has qualified to appear on the ballot in the November 2002 general election.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Tracy Tucker v. State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Eby v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Evans v. Teton CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hayden Lake Fire Protection District v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. Philip Morris, R.J. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API