Legal Opinion

Amey v. Erb

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1929No. Appeal, 89PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The plaintiff, Amey, recovered a verdict against the defendant, Erb, for $11,405, for personal loss caused by the overturn of his automobile, resulting in serious injuries from which he still suffers. It was shown that he was driving his father’s truck, carrying a heavy load of lumber, on the early morning of October 23, 1926, down a hill on the Bethlehem Pike. He was proceeding at a comparatively slow speed, with at least one light burning. The road was seventeen or eighteen feet in width, with a berm on each side of one and one-half or two feet. Though still…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lenahan v. Pittston Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Petrie v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Robinson v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Altomari v. KrugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Eldredge v. SargentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Curtiss v. FahleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Miles v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API