Legal Opinion

Landis v. Conestoga Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1944No. 1; Appeals, 251-254PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

These are actions brought by the Administratrix of the Estate of Betty Jane Landis, deceased, and the Administrator of John H. Kuhn, Jr., deceased, against Conestoga Transportation Company, John L. Warner, Claude S. Warner, and O. A. Miller and Clarence Miller trading as Miller Motor Freight Service, for the recovery of damages for the deaths of Betty Jane Landis, a fifteen year old girl, and John H. Kuhn, Jr., a sixteen year old boy, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendants.

Briefly summarized from a record of seven hundred pages, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jinks v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Hughes v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Ashworth v. HannumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Ashby v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Smith v. FennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API