Legal Opinion

Fairbanks v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 5, 1965No. [App. No. 92, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.

This is an application for leave to appeal from an order of the Criminal Court of Baltimore, dated October 2, 1964, finding the applicant to be a defective delinquent and recommitting him to Patuxent Institution under the provisions of Code (1957, 1964 Cum. Supp.), Article 31B. He was found guilty of sodomy on February 26, 1960, and on April 1 of that year was sentenced to one year in the Maryland House of Correction, and subsequently transferred to Patuxent Institution for evaluation, after a hearing. He was committed to that institution by Judge Manley on March 17, 1961, and his application…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Silvestri v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Colbert v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Cooper v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Fairbanks v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johns v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Schlatter v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Kroneburg v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API