Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 16, 1964No. [App. No. 110, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

In this application for leave to appeal from a recommitment order passed by the trial court upon a jury finding of defective delinquency on his petition for a review, the applicant alleges: (1) that the only evidence (other than the psychiatric reports) showing that he was still a defective delinquent was that of the director of Patuxent; (2) that the evidence as a whole was legally insufficient to support the finding of defective delinquency; (3) that the verdict of the jury was erroneous in that it was against the evidence; and (4) that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

Ther…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Purks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Palmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Faulkner v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Silvestri v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Johns v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Colbert v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Daniels v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Gilliard v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API