Legal Opinion
Dominguez v. Perovich Properties, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 2005No. 24,932PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff Paul Dominguez appeals from an adverse summary judgment rejecting his tort claim for personal injury, commonly called a “Delgado claim.” Plaintiff sought relief against his employer, Perovich Properties, Inc. (Employer), outside of the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -70 (1929, as amended through 2004), alleging Employer wilfully and intentionally injured him. In Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc., 2001-NMSC-034, 131 N.M. 272, 34 P.3d 1148, our Supreme Court permitted a worker to sue his employer in tort for an injury received…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Morales v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Stein v. Alpine Sports, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Salazar v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Padilla v. Wall Colmonoy Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- May v. DCP Midstream, L.P.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Pearson v. Johnson Controls, Northern N.M., LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Pearson v. JOHNSON CONTROLS, NORTHERN NMNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.