Legal Opinion

Morales v. Reynolds

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 2004No. 24,379, 24,161PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion Pickard, J.

{1} The two cases on appeal here present an opportunity to examine the standard announced in Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc., 2001-NMSC-034, 131 N.M. 272, 34 P.3d 1148, which expanded the set of circumstances under which a worker may pursue an independent tort action outside of the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, § 52-1-9 (1973). We hold that neither of these cases meets the requirements of the test set forth in Delgado, 2001-NMSC-034, ¶ 26, 131 N.M. 272, 34 P.3d 1148. We consolidate the cases and affirm both district court decisions in favor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Knapp v. Fraternal Order of EaglesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Segura v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Salazar v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ovecka v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Padilla v. Wall Colmonoy Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Dominguez v. Perovich Properties, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API