Legal Opinion
May v. DCP Midstream, L.P.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 2010No. 29,331, 29,490; 32,557PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff appeals from two orders of the district court. First, the district court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, concluding that Plaintiffs evidence failed to satisfy the requirements of a Delgado claim. See Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc., 2001-NMSC-034, ¶ 24, 131 N.M. 272, 34 P.3d 1148 (“We hold that when an employer intentionally inflicts or willfully causes a worker to suffer an injury that would otherwise be exclusively compensable under the [Workers’ Compensation] Act, that employer may not enjoy the benefits of exclusivity, and the injured…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of Santa Fe v. KomisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Morales v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richey v. Hammond Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Camarena v. Superior Contracting Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
- May v. DCP MIDSTREAM, LPNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Richey v. Hammond Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014