Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 17, 1996No. 13811PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court upholding the right of the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Easton (board), to reconsider a decision it had made *513and published. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that the board could reconsider and revoke its original decision without any material change of circumstances or the introduction of newly discovered evidence, (2) held that the board could reconsider and revoke its original decision when the court failed to find that the board’s decision to reconsider was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Bridgeport Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Wight v. Town of SouthingtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Anderson v. Gallow, No. Cv 97 0055145 S (Oct. 12, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API