Legal Opinion
Tate v. Cutrer
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1951No. 3427PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
53 So.2d 285 (1951)
TATE
v.
CUTRER et al.
No. 3427.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
June 29, 1951.
Reid & Reid, Hammond, for appellant.
Ponder & Ponder, Amite, Alfred W. Spiller, Jr., Hammond, for appellee.
ELLIS, Judge.
This is a boundary suit in which the plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of 106 acres of land, more or less, partly bounded on the west and south by certain pieces of property owned by the defendant, Robert B. Cutrer, Mrs. Martha Ryals Cutrer, and I. M. McGehee, Jr. and that the boundary line between these contiguous estates has never been determined and established. C.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Opdenwyer v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Henly v. KaskLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
- Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeRosenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- Crow v. BraleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sattler v. PellichinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Duplantis v. LocascioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Adams v. EtheredgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Branch v. HinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Sessum v. HemperleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.