Legal Opinion

Crow v. Braley

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1950No. 7533PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDY, Judge.

This is an action instituted by plaintiff for the purpose of fixing á boundary between the contiguous estates of plaintiff and defendants. Defendants interposed pleas of prescription of ten, twenty and thirty years, and after trial there was judgment sustaining the plea of prescription of thirty years and overruling the other pleas. From this judgment plaintiffs have appealed. Inasmuch as defendants have neither appealed nor answered plaintiff’s appeal, the judgment with respect to the pleas of ten and twenty years prescription is no longer at issue and the only question which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Opdenwyer v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Henly v. KaskLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Latiolais v. RobertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Broussard v. WinnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sessum v. HemperleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  2. Tate v. CutrerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Arabie v. TerrebonneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Beene v. PardueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Ponder v. FussellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API