Legal Opinion

United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided April 3, 1959No. Civ. A. 1-299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKLIN, District Judge.

This cause has been submitted on motions for summary judgment filed by each of the parties, and the Court, after having considered the complaint, the answer and amendment thereto, the affidavits attached to each motion for summary judgment, certified public documents, memoranda of law submitted by both parties, and after hearing arguments of counsel, finds the facts specifically which constitute the grounds of the action of the Court upon said motions as follows:

Findings of Fact

1

That this action is being prosecuted by the United States of America by its attorney for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mccleneghan v. Union Stock Yards Co. Of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1968
  3. McClenegman v. Union Stock Yards Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. Rardin Grain Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API