Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 5, 1968No. Civ. A. No. KC-2415PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

2Per curiam

This is an action instituted by the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company to enjoin, set aside and suspend orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission entered in two combined administrative proceedings, wherein the Commission held that certain shipment detention practices provided by Santa Fe constituted an unpublished service of delay1 and that certain tariff rules proposed by Santa Fe to authorize those practices were not just and reasonable.2

The action was brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, and 2321-2325. A three-judge court was convened pursuant to…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Western Paper Makers' Chemical Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad v. Industrial Scrap Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  2. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
  3. Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Mobil Alaska Pipeline Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Sohio Pipe Line Company, Amerada Hess Pipeline Corporation, Union Alaska Pipeline Company, Intervening State of Alaska and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, Intervening Bp Pipelines Inc. v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Exxon Pipeline Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Union Alaska Pipeline Company, Intervening Arco Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, State of Alaska, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API