Legal Opinion
McClenegman v. Union Stock Yards Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1962No. 16613PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.
This is a private antitrust action for treble damages. It presumably is based on §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and § 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2 and 15, respectively. The district court dismissed the action on the ground that it did not have primary jurisdiction over the subject matter. The appeal is from that dismissal.
The complaint alleges:
Plaintiff is an individual. Defendant Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha (“Stockyards”) is a corporation operating the Omaha stockyards and furnishing stockyard services and facilities in interstate commerce there.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mccleneghan v. Union Stock Yards Co. Of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962