Legal Opinion

Miller v. EchoHawk

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1994No. 20398PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

I

INTRODUCTION

This case involves an award of attorney fees to respondent under the Private Attorney General Doctrine. We affirm.

II

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1990, the federal census was taken. The Idaho legislature is obligated to reapportion itself based on the census data. In the spring of 1991, the legislature began working on the reapportionment plan in preparation for the release of the census data. In the fall of 1991, a rough draft of a plan was drawn. According to the Memorandum Decision and Order (Memorandum Decision) issued by the district court, a number of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. William v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Associates Northwest, Inc. v. BeetsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. County of Ada v. Red Steer Drive-Ins of Nevada, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Smith v. MittonIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Electrical Wholesale Supply Co. v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Van Valkenburgh v. Citizens for Term LimitsIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Boundary Backpackers v. Boundary CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API