Legal Opinion
Vandermark v. Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 23, 1981No. 81-1327PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises a question under the United States Housing Act (“USHA”) of 1937, as amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f. The USHA provides for financial assistance from the federal government to state and local governments to remedy unsafe and unsanitary housing conditions, as well as housing shortages, of low income families. Specifically, Section 8 of the USHA, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f, authorizes the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) to enter into annual contribution…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mathews v. De CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vandermark v. Housing Authority of City of YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Hill v. Group Three Housing Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Hill v. Group Three Housing Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Mary Bakos v. Flint Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984