Legal Opinion
Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 17, 2012No. 10 Civ. 6950(LBS)(JCF)PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SAND, District Judge.
Defendants Goldman, Sachs & Co. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (collectively, “Goldman”) object to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis’s January 19, 2012, 2012 WL 205875, Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) denying Defendants’ motion to strike all class allegations as well as their motion for partial summary judgment.
For the reasons that follow, Judge Francis’s R & R is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The Court assumes familiarity with the facts of the case, which are laid out in detail in the R & R. See R & R (Dkt. No. 134) 2-8.
II.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Kassman v. KPMG LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Reynolds v. Lifewatch, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Talarico v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Mayfield v. Asta Funding, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.