Legal Opinion
Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 15, 2013No. 10 Civ. 6950 (AT) (JCF)PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this putative class action, the plaintiffs allege that their employers, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (collectively, “Goldman Sachs”), engaged in a pattern of gender discrimination against female professional employees in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107 et seq. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that they have been discriminated against with respect to compensation, promotion,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Johnson v. J. Walter Thompson U.S.A., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. Mount Sinai HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Beyond Bespoke Tailors, Inc. v. BarchiesiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Blanchard v. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.; Nolan, et al. v. IBMDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Brunckhorst III v. BischoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.