Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. of the West v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 11, 2003No. 99-124CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks summary judgment, claiming entitlement to three payments wrongfully made by the Government to a defaulted contractor bonded by plaintiff. Defendant moves to dismiss, or, alternatively, for summary judgment, based, inter alia, on lan*531guage from a Federal Circuit opinion that calls into question a surety’s ability to sue the United States under the theory of equitable subrogation. Argument is deemed unnecessary.

FACTS

The facts, unless otherwise noted, are undisputed, and are drawn from the complaint, the parties’ motions and proposed findings of fact, and the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Nelson Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Nova Casualty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API