Legal Opinion
Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 26, 2006No. 04-1478CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is a motion by the defendant, the United States (“government” or “United States”), to dismiss the complaint of the plaintiff, Capitol Indemnity Corporation (“plaintiff' or “Capitol Indemnity”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The government contends that the plaintiff, a Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 3131-3134 (2000 & Supp.2002), surety of a government contractor who fulfilled its obligations only under a payment bond on a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- William A. Ransom and Robert D. Nesen v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Insurance Co. of West v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- National American Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Wagner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Cincinnati Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.