Legal Opinion

Beaumont v. Brown

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1975PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

Plaintiff, Robert A. Beaumont, brought suit against defendants for invasion of privacy. Defendants moved for summary judgment, but the trial judge ruled that the plaintiff raised sufficient issues as to material facts to take the case to the jury. Defendants appeal from that ruling by leave granted.

Robert Beaumont was employed as a labor safety supervisor for the Michigan Department of Labor for a number of years prior to November 20, 1972. Defendant Barry Brown was Director of the Department of Labor at that time, and defendant Arthur Zink was the personnel director. On November 20, 1972,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. De May v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Earp v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Birch Run Nursery v. JemalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Beaumont v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Tobin v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Corcoran v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Hall v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API