Birch Run Nursery v. Jemal
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.
The trial court granted defendants’ motion for accelerated judgment and summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 116 and 117. Plaintiffs appeal as of right. On appeal, we accept as true the well-pleaded facts in plaintiffs’ complaint. Harrison v Arrow Metal Products Corp, 20 Mich App 590; 174 NW2d 875 (1969); Johnston’s Administrator v United Airlines, 23 Mich App 279; 178 NW2d 536 (1970).
The claims of plaintiff, Birch Run Nursery, an alleged Michigan copartnership, and plaintiffs Arthur R. Alexander and Hugh Alexander, in their capacity as surviving partners, are asserted in counts one and two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrison v. Arrow Metal Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Cibor v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Johnston's Administrator v. United AirlinesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Burton v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Wright v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Unger v. Forest Home TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Stewart v. TrouttMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Potes v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Robinson v. Emmet County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Beaumont v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.