Legal Opinion
McComb v. Frank Scerbo & Sons, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 13, 1948No. Civ. 40-167PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEDINA, District Judge.
In an action by the Wage and Hour Division Administrator for an injunction restraining defendants from violating the provisions of Sections 15(a) (1),-15(a) (2) and 15(a) (5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 et seq., plaintiff moves for summary judgment. The facts have been stipulated; defendants have consented to the issuance of a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from further violations of the Act; and the sole question involved is the legality and propriety of including in the judgment a direction “that said defendants make…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Alexander v. HillmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Odell v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- McComb v. Frank Scerbo & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Southern New England Distributing Corp. v. Berkeley Finance Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1962
- Wirtz v. Robert E. Bob Adair, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1963
- Firemen's Ins. Co. Of Newark, N.J. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.