Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 2003No. 94PA02-2PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Chief Justice.

The sole issue presently before this Court in this case is whether the trial court correctly determined that the General Assembly’s 2002 revised redistricting plans are unconstitutional. After careful review, we conclude the trial court ruled correctly, and we therefore affirm.

The procedural history of this case is reported in detail in Stephenson v. Bartlett, 355 N.C. 354, 358-60, 562 S.E.2d 377, 381-83 (2002) (Stephenson I). We nonetheless recite the basic procedural history below to include events that have transpired since this Court issued its decision in Stephenson I.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Hoke County Board of Education v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. OutenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API