Legal Opinion

Lieske v. Natsuhara

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1931No. 23177. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— This is a personal injury action. It was alleged that, while Anny Lieske was walking along the highway near the paved portion of it, she was struck and severely injured by a beam of timber negligently allowed to extend about eight feet sideways from a truck owned and operated by the defendant, C. Natsuhara. There was a judgment for the plaintiffs, husband and wife, upon the verdict of the jury. The defendant has appealed.

The only error assigned is the giving of instruction No. 7, in substance to the effect that, if the finding should be for the plaintiffs, it should justly, fairly and fully…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gallamore v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Freidrich v. Territory of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Webster v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cole v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Anderson v. Hurley-Mason Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Texas Steel Company v. RecerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Reed v. Jamieson Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Taylor v. LubetichWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. McDonough v. Pacific Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API