Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Lubetich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1939No. 27611PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries and expenses incurred as the result thereof, and for damage to an automobile. The action was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover upon each of the items mentioned. Judgment was entered against the defendants in the sum of eighty-five hundred dollars, and from this judgment, the defendants appeal.

The facts, as they appear in the findings, will be summarized as follows: The accident which caused the bringing of the action occurred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Webster v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Ongaro v. TwohyWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Keller v. WaddingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Lauber v. LyonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Auerbach v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Karniss v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Erdman v. Lower Yakima Valley B.P.O.E. Lodge No. 2112Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Leak v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API