Legal Opinion

Reed v. Jamieson Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1932No. 23635. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Dr. Reed, commenced this action in the superior court for Spokane county seeking recovery of damages for personal injuries suffered, as he claims, as the result of the negligent operation of a passenger elevator by a servant of the defendant investment company, in an office building owned and maintained • by it in the city of Spokane. Trial in the superior court for that county, sitting with a jury, resulted in verdict and judgment awarding to Dr. Reed recovery in the sum of ten thousand dollars, from which the investment company has appealed to this court.

On October 11, 1930,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Harmon's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Burge v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bennett v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Estes v. BabcockWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Olson v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Wooldridge v. WoolettWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. McAlister v. CarlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Hogan v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Auerbach v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API