Legal Opinion

Squires v. Summers

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9702PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Martin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was an action for partition by tha appellants against the appellees, who claimed that one of the tracts in controversy belonged to them 'exclusively, under a conveyance from the common ancestor.

The cause was tried by the court, who stated in writing a special finding of the facts and the conclusions of la\t thereon.

The conclusions of law were, that the appellants were entitled to partition of one of the tracts only, and that the appellees owned the other exclusively; the court also found that the land owned jointly by all the parties ought to be sold, and appointed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Souverbye v. ArdenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. Games v. Stiles Ex Dem. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Robbins v. MageeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Berry v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Stout v. DunningIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arnegaard v. ArnegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Vaughan v. GodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Osborne v. EslingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. McKemey v. KetchumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Stout v. RaylIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API