Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Warner Holding Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1945No. 13087PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is an action brought by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, under § 205(a) 1 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 23, 33; 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925(a), to compel *530compliance with § 4(a) 2 of the Act. The question for decision is whether the District Court erred in refusing to order the defendant (appellee) to tender to tenants, from whom it had collected rentals in excess of the maximum permitted by the applicable regulation, the amounts which they had been overcharged.
The appellee, Warner Holding Company (which will be referred…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Peñagarícano v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
- McBride v. HoseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- United States v. NasifDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1952
- Peñagarícano v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.