Legal Opinion

United States v. Nasif

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided March 24, 1952No. Civ. No. 3388PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, Chief Judge.

The question to be determined here is whether defendant is entitled to a jury trial on the issue of having collected more from her tenants than the permissible rates under the Rent Control Act, coupled with a demand for treble damages. The tenants failed to sue within the delays provided by the statute, and the Government brought this action both for damages and for an injunction pursuant to Sections 205 and 206 of the Housing and Rent Control Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 1881-1902. It charged that defendant had, over varying periods, collected from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Alexander v. HillmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mandell v. Yellow Cab Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1958
  2. Uthes v. BrownellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API