Legal Opinion
United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 10, 1944No. Nos. 62, 64PublishedCited by 333 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
The United States of America brought suit in the District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Bausch & Lomb Optical Company, a corporation, and the Soft-Lite Lens Company, Inc., and several of the chief officers of each, to restrain violations of the Sherman Act. Jurisdiction was conferred on the trial court by § 4 of the Act (15 U. S. C. § 4) and upon this Court by | 2 of the Act of February 11, 1903 (15 U. S. C. § 29 and Judicial Code §238).
The complaint alleged that Bausch & Lomb and Soft-Lite and their officers contracted, combined and conspired to restrain trade in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by333 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
328 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.