Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Commander

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 13, 1994No. ACM 30038PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

YOUNG, Judge:

Contrary to his plea, a general court-martial composed of members convicted appellant of wrongfully possessing anabolic steroids. Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (1988). He was acquitted of wrongfully using, introducing onto a military installation, and soliciting another to possess, anabolic steroids. The court members sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-l. Appellant assigns five errors, which we have broken down into six1: (1) The evidence is legally insufficient to support a finding of guilt; (2) the military judge erred…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. SimoyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  2. United States v. GalchickUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  3. United States v. GalloUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  4. United States v. LangerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. TaylorUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API