Legal Opinion
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 27, 2010No. 08-56874PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TUNHEIM, District Judge:
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) alleging that UPS Supply Chain Solutions (“UPS”) failed to provide reasonable accommodations for Mauricio Centeno’s deafness because UPS did not provide him with a sign language interpreter for certain staff meetings, disciplinary sessions, and training. The district court granted summary judgment to UPS on all claims. The EEOC appeals the district court’s decision. We find that there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether UPS unlawfully…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Federal Trade Commission v. StefanchikCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Richard Vos v. City of Newport BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Noll v. International Business Machines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Nicholas Keith v. County of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Goonan v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.