Legal Opinion
Goonan v. Federal Reserve Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 7, 2013No. 12 Civ. 3859(JPO)PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“the Fed”) has filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“Compl.”) filed by Bruce Goonan (“Plaintiff’). Plaintiff alleges discrimination and retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law § 290 et seq., and the Administrative Code of the City of New York, § 8-101 et seq. The Fed has moved to dismiss Plaintiffs claims on the ground that it offered him reasonable accommodations and Plaintiff subsequently…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Anthony Rorrer v. City of StowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Quadir v. New York State Department of LaborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Berger v. N.Y.C. Police Dep'tDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Vale v. Great Neck Water Pollution Control DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Lewis v. Blackman Plumbing Supply L.L.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.