Legal Opinion
Department of Corrections v. Goulsby
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 17, 2004No. 51855-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
— Rai Goulsby filed a personal restraint petition challenging the result of an infraction hearing at the prison where he was incarcerated. Conceding that the requirements of due process were not met at the original hearing, the Department of Corrections (DOC) sought permission of this court to rehear the infraction. Relying on In re Personal Restraint of Leland, 115 Wn. App. 517, 61 P.3d 357, review denied, 149 Wn.2d 1025 (2003), Goulsby argues that the DOC has no jurisdiction to rehear a prison infraction once a personal restraint petition is filed. Because neither the Rules of Appellate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- STATE EX REL. FRANKLIN v. McBrideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- McNabb v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- McNabb v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- In re the Personal Restraint of SilasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- In re the Personal Restraint of HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.