Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Silas

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 23, 2006No. 53393-2-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

¶1 While incarcerated for two drug felonies, Roosevelt Silas III sought 50 percent earned early release time based on the 2003 amendments to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A RCW, that increased eligibility for earned early release time from 30 to 50 percent for certain classes of offenders. The Department of Corrections (DOC) denied Silas’ request. The amended statute makes the enhanced credit unavailable to offenders with a conviction for “crimes against persons” as defined in the SRA. DOC determined Silas was ineligible for 50 percent earned early release time because…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re the Personal Restraint of MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SchernerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. COUCILCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. CoucilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API