Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Higgins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2004No. 74253-7PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

In this case, we review whether the Department of Corrections (DOC) has jurisdiction to rehear an infraction while a personal restraint petition (PRP) concerning the infraction is pending in the appellate court, and whether double jeopardy principles preclude the rehearing. We hold that DOC has jurisdiction to conduct a rehearing and that DOC’s rehearing of the infraction does not violate the principles of double jeopardy. Therefore, we affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision.

FACTS

On July 9, 2002, prison authorities issued a serious infraction report charging petitioner, David Higgins, an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Rivett v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of MalikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Damien Arthur WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Personal Restraint Petition Of Clinton Doyle HeckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Personal Restraint Petition Of Jess R. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API