Legal Opinion
Delores Walcek, Stanley Walcek, Albert Walcek, and Regina Ammons v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 11, 2002No. 01-5108PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs-appellants, Dolores, Stanley, and Albert Walcek, and Regina Am-mons (collectively the “Walceks”), appeal a judgment by the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims” or “trial court”). The Court of Federal Claims determined that the regulation of the Walceks’ real property pursuant to section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344, effected no Fifth Amendment taking. Walcek v. United States, 49 Fed. Cl. 248, 249 (Fed.Cl.2001) (“Walcek II”). Because the Court of Federal Claims committed no error in its application of the factors…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gilbert M. Hair and Ethel Blaine Millett (On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Roque De La Fuente II v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.