Legal Opinion

Stagner v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1990No. 71240PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BAILEY, Judge:

Appellant seeks review of the Trial Court’s order granting judgment to Appel-lees. Appellee Jim Highfill, D.D.S., (Employer), employed Appellant as a dental hygienist for about ten years, and appar ently paid Appellant on a “commission” basis, i.e., a percentage of proceeds generated from Appellant’s work. On the advice of his accountant, and to better document his employees’ hours, Employer installed a time clock. Employer required Appellant and other employees to clock in and out using the time clock. Appellant did not use the time clock after April, 1987.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. In Re the Discharge of WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Tynes v. Uniroyal Tire Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nordam v. Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Myers v. Employment Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
  4. Myers v. Employment Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API