Stagner v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security Commission
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BAILEY, Judge:
Appellant seeks review of the Trial Court’s order granting judgment to Appel-lees. Appellee Jim Highfill, D.D.S., (Employer), employed Appellant as a dental hygienist for about ten years, and appar ently paid Appellant on a “commission” basis, i.e., a percentage of proceeds generated from Appellant’s work. On the advice of his accountant, and to better document his employees’ hours, Employer installed a time clock. Employer required Appellant and other employees to clock in and out using the time clock. Appellant did not use the time clock after April, 1987.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- In Re the Discharge of WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Tynes v. Uniroyal Tire Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nordam v. Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Myers v. Employment Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
- Myers v. Employment Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990