Legal Opinion
Nordam v. Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 1, 1996No. 84208PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
Certiorari to the Court of Appeals, Division III, to review an unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals. The issue presented is whether the acts of Morrison amount to misconduct.
SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Willa Morrison was employed by Nordam as an insurance clerk from October 1990 to October 1993. On October 13,1993, a supervisor at Nordam presented Morrison with a written memorandum concerning her work performance. The memorandum informed Morrison that: (1) her work day began at 8:00 a.m. and ended at 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, and, since June 1, 1993…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Isabella v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Stagner v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- Unemployment Insurance Commission v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
- Gonsalves v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gilchrist v. Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Gilchrist v. OKL. EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'NSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Moore v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012