Bailey v. Schaaf
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.
Our common law has long imposed the same duty of care on landlords and merchants to remedy physical defects in premises over which they exert control. This consistency is premised on the similar degree of control both landlords and merchants exercise over the premises. Where third parties commit criminal acts against tenants and invitees in these controlled areas, landlords and merchants share a similar, albeit lesser, degree of control because of the inherent unpredictability of criminal conduct. Such unpredictability requires the imposition of a duty concomitant with the decreased amount of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Hoffner v. LanctoeMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- King v. Michigan State Police DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Quinto v. Woodward Detroit CVS, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bailey v. SchaafMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Roberts v. SalmiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Aes Management Inc v. Keckes Silver & Gadd PcMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.