Legal Opinion
Zimmerman v. Poindexter
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 12, 1947No. Civ. 730PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
In this action motion has been duly made by the plaintiff, cooperative with a subpoena duces tecum, for an order requiring the production by the Commanding General, Army Ground Forces, Pacific, Honolulu, T. H., of documentary evidence in his possession and specified as, “That certain file and/or a group of files in the custody and possession of said witness and pertaining to the imprisonment by the defendants, of the plaintiff.” By answer to such motion, the Secretary of the Army, the lawful custodian of the files .of the Department of the Army, for which the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. BurrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1807
- Ex Parte SackettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Crosby v. Pacific S. S. Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by18 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Capitol Fish CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- City of Buffalo v. Hanna Furnace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Carr v. Monroe Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.