Legal Opinion
In Re Spickelmier
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada
Decided April 27, 2012No. 19-10581PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION 1
BRUCE A. MARKELL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The hearing on this Rule 9011 Order to Show Cause did not start auspiciously. After reserving a half-day for the hearing, the court waited to call the matter to allow debtors’ counsel, who was subject to the order and whose tardy arrival the court anticipated, extra time to arrive. After waiting almost ten minutes, the court took appearances, and only one lawyer — for a creditor — entered an appearance. One debtor was also present.
Without any appearance by the attorney or law firm named in the Order to Show Cause, the court indicated it…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Christian v. Mattel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Carol Freeman Marsch, Debtor (Two Cases). John D. Marsch, Claimant-Appellant v. Carol F. Marsch, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shalaby v. Mansdorf (In Re Nakhuda)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- In re Miller Automotive Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
- In re LeeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- In re SponhouseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2012