Shalaby v. Mansdorf (In Re Nakhuda)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JURY, Bankruptcy Judge:
The bankruptcy court issued an Order to Show Cause (OSC) directing Andrew W. Shalaby (Shalaby), the attorney for chapter 7 1 debtor Farouk E. Nakhuda, to show cause why he should not be required to disgorge fees he had been paid and sanctioned for violations of Rule 9011. After a hearing, the bankruptcy court issued a Memorandum Decision finding that Shalaby asserted numerous positions in filed documents without an adequate basis in law or fact. As a result, the court imposed sanctions consisting of: (1) non-compensatory monetary sanction for $8,000 payable to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In re D'ArataUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2018
- In re KlitschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- In re BealeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Andrew Shalaby v. Executive Committee of the UniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Andrew Shalaby v. Executive Committee of the UniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.