Legal Opinion
In re Sponhouse
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 27, 2012No. 12-10930-MKNPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ATTORNEY PETER C. NUT-TALL SHOULD NOT BE SANC*149TIONED1
MIKE K. NAKAGAWA, Bankruptcy Judge.
On August 1, 2012, the Order to Show Cause Why Attorney Peter C. Nuttall Should Not be Sanctioned Pursuant to Rule 9011 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the Court’s Inherent Sanctions Authority Under 11 U.S.C. § 105, or the Local Bankruptcy Rules (“OSC”) came on for hearing before the court. After arguments were presented, the matter was taken under submission.
The OSC stems from two chapter 7 bankruptcy petitions filed by attorney Peter C. Nuttall (“Nuttall”) on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hale v. United States Trustee (In Re Basham)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re NguyenUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Orton v. Hoffman (In Re Kayne)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re TranUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2010
- In Re SpickelmierUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sundquist v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Sundquist)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2017