TM HEAD v. Local Union No. 83, Journeymen Barbers
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
Appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling demurrer to the bill of complaint. Complainants are Local Union No. 83, Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers, Cosmetologists and Proprietors’ International Union of America, and Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers, Cosmetologists and Proprietors’ International Union of America. Respondent and appellant is T. M. Head, who does business as “Tom Head Barber Shop” and who, it is alleged, “habitually works with the tools of the trade in his said barber shop.”
The purpose of the bill is to prevent appellant from retaining and displaying the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. HankeSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Crosby v. RathOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Saulsberry v. Coopers International UnionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Foutts v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International UnionOhio Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists, International Union of America, Local 256California Supreme Court · 1960
- Journeymen Barbers' International Union, Local 687 v. PollinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Kerkemeyer v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Wisconsin Employment Relations Board v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers, Cosmetologists & Proprietors International UnionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, ETC., LOCAL 687 v. PollinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.